<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="0.92"><channel><title>Swans, Sherbet and Coathangers</title><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/</link><description>Rambling is good</description><language>en-EU</language><docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs><item><title>In response to:Que Blimey</title><description>This is hilarious, see my page for my views on this.</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2008/10/30/que-blimey-4956374/#c8132862</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:12:40 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Ding Dongs and Energy Savers</title><description>If you want to save the planet, don't use blackle.  It actually uses more power on an LCD monitor than does google.  Please see the video where we tested it with a watt meter:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
http://cableorganizer.com/electricity-power-meter/</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/09/03/ding_dongs_and_energy_savers~2916673/#c4536304</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:31:07 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Greenery</title><description>I'm sure the RSPCA would be interested to know that you have a cow AND a pig in you 'fridge! Bad girl.........cassie</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/06/08/greenery~2417544/#c3742081</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:56:21 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Greenery</title><description>The other prisoners requested it.</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/06/08/greenery~2417544/#c3742060</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:53:40 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Logo</title><description>congrats.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
as you are a bloke the wedding protocol is just turn up.  don't get involved, she won't listen to you anyway.</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/06/06/logo~2404703/#c3721360</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:14:31 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Poach</title><description>It's definitely good for cooling down. But then I end up feeling... cold and exposed! I have weird body temperature issues. Bleh. </description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/05/01/poach~2191765/#c3425459</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 09:17:32 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Poach</title><description>Just sleep ontop of the covers.Works for me.</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/05/01/poach~2191765/#c3421980</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 19:38:04 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Gurgle</title><description>Skype is fading into the past, you've always been able to make similar calls over MSN to other computers.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
They do offer cheap international rates if you want to call an actual phone but why be stuck to a headset making calls when you can use your mobile or any other phone to access VOIP connections without having to be anywhere near an internet connection or computer yourself?? Purchasing a Skype handset is hardly the answer, pockets are too full of mobile phones and iPods! :)</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/03/06/gurgle~1857107/#c3371505</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:48:59 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Beggars belief</title><description>Part of me feels happy that I paid for the service I used. But it's only a very small part. The rest of me is thinking: "Damn."</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/03/15/beggars_belief~1909572/#c3035140</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:36:48 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Beggars belief</title><description>When my hubby and I went for a tour in Paris, we didn't notice that the MRT's entrance barriers were wide open (it was nearly midnight) and we bought the tickets at the machine for nothing. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
How foolish we felt after a hard time of figuring how to get the tickets and finally got it and then found out that we didn't even have to go through all that troubles, including paying for them.  </description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/03/15/beggars_belief~1909572/#c3035025</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:23:26 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Popping</title><description>Hey, I used to play Shadow Run. Very good (addictive) game. I can quite believe this.</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/03/09/popping~1874901/#c3011050</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:56:20 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Gurgle</title><description>It's very nice to read about Bean on your blog!  She is enjoying her new pair of shoes and looking very grown up when she toddles along in them.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(Also, I sympathise about the comments in the later post about booking hotel rooms.)</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/03/06/gurgle~1857107/#c2975338</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:36:58 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Homely</title><description>hehe 90 mins of football would be too long if it involved Preston and Cardiff.  Arsenal and Chelsea would be better!  Fights galore (well handbags really) and some slick passing (in places)!  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
but I can't talk being a palace fan!  4-1!  You're a lucky sod!  I went to Ninian over the Christmas hols, got rained on and what for!?!  To spend 90 mins watching an 'exciting' 0-0 draw between Crystal Palace and Cardiff!!  Try that for a fun afternoon out......&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
.... i'd have killed for 5 goals (even at the wrong end!!).</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/02/26/homely~1808264/#c2910663</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 01:13:37 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Score</title><description>Fear not, I don't think there's much danger of me making a habit of this! I hope they do chips...</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/02/21/score~1779445/#c2875678</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:23:12 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Score</title><description>Don't do it! I got the football bug after screaming my head off at a game aged seven. Now, 23-and-a-bit years later, I find my head crammed with footie-related trivia, and more useful stuff struggling to get a look in. Hence I'm attempting to download it all onto my blog; then I might finally get round to reading War and Peace and taking up Italian.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you must go, enjoy the game!</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/02/21/score~1779445/#c2875535</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:04:57 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Fear</title><description>That's very true. The cost would probably take away the magic of the those very words.</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/02/19/fear~1767073/#c2844901</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:26:27 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Centurion</title><description>My daughter's first birthday was fantastic thank you!!!!!!!!!  And am glad that this Valentine's Day made up for all the others for you!</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/02/16/centurion~1751241/#c2844825</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:17:50 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Fear</title><description>Yes, until you discover the cost of un-sprongling something!</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/02/19/fear~1767073/#c2844811</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:16:14 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Fear</title><description>The downside to not driving is that I wont get to hear that my Flippertygiblet has gone all sprongly. They sound like the words everyone wants to hear! </description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/02/19/fear~1767073/#c2844339</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:01:39 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Mud</title><description>I went to Viney Hill on about 3 youth weekend with St Denys it was a cool place and mucho fun.  An account of the 2005 weekend is here!  http://www.stdenyschurch.org.uk/youth_weekend_05.htm &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Yeah a girl in our office was reading 'You are what you eat' and apparently according to the backcover Gillian's 'degree' was on the Philosophy of Food Nutrition.  Now my friend is doing a PHD in Philosophy and as far as I can gather it is all to do with arguing and be able to BullS**t  so logically it means Gillian's 'degree' is enabling her to BullS**t about food nutrition.  it all makes sense now. Sadly its scary to see how much people trust someone just because they've a tv show!</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/02/12/mud~1727212/#c2826363</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:10:41 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Centurion</title><description>Hope you had a good St Skeletor's Day! :)</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/02/16/centurion~1751241/#c2825064</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:24:39 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Funch</title><description>I thought we decieded funch was a fun lunch. &lt;br&gt;
However I do feel you should be able to funch. It is what they call in primary school a doing word. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
To Twank. To metaphorically (another word that should be removed as ot is to long) pluck away at something. Dont know why. Just sounded good at the moment.</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/02/13/funch~1733533/#c2802678</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:23:32 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Mud</title><description>The joys of mud-hugs.</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/02/12/mud~1727212/#c2798324</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:17:15 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Mud</title><description>It was scary, but not that scary.</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/02/12/mud~1727212/#c2798320</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:16:45 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Mud</title><description>it was all over his face. i made sure of that. not guilty of the pants though.</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/02/12/mud~1727212/#c2796192</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:23:43 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Mud</title><description>Mud in your pants!!! A likely story!!!</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/02/12/mud~1727212/#c2796094</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:10:00 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Walmart</title><description>Absolutely.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Intriguingly, one of the major things the Walton (Walmart) family has spent their money on is a large underground fortress (think James Bond Baddie), capable of withstanding a large scale nuclear attack. So, in the event of armageddon, at least they'll survive. Money well spent, there!</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/02/08/walmart~1703453/#c2761631</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 14:57:43 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Walmart</title><description>A lot of Gates's charitable giving is to... foundations controlled by Gates. He is doing good, but he is also avoiding lots of tax.</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/02/08/walmart~1703453/#c2761562</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 14:46:24 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Mush</title><description>Tee hee hee!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You're probably right, though.</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/02/06/mush~1691167/#c2752384</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 10:29:38 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Mush</title><description>"But, I am throwing everything at it this year, so I don't have to bother next year. :D :p"&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thats just cheeky. I'm sure it will be such a success that you won't be able to wait till next year!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I can recomend egg pizza. Think it would be better with sausage, bacon, tomato and hash browns. Maybe a few beens and BBQ sauce for good measure.</description><link>http://swanssherbetcoathangers.blog.co.uk/2007/02/06/mush~1691167/#c2752221</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 09:49:57 +0100</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
